posted on 2020-06-12, 16:51authored byTingting Zhao, Zhongqu Duan, Georgi Z. Genchev, Hui Lu
Supplementary Tables:
Table S1: Table showing information of 17 de novo assemblies used in this study. Table S2: Table showing information of 279 next-generation sequencing samples used in this study. Table S3: Table showing identifying euchromatic and non-euchromatic gaps. Table S4: Table showing euchromatic gaps and non-euchromatic gaps information. Table S5: Table showing all of the gap-closing sequences in 17 human de novo assemblies, four non-human primate genomes and other NRS datasets. Table S7: Table showing the gap-closing sequences closed by NA24385 with MUMmer in QUAST.
Supplementary Figures:
Figure S1: Comparision between gap-closing sequences involved in the closed gaps from minimap2 and MUMmer in the individual genome NA24385. Figure S2: Non-redundant gap-closing seuqneces covered by unmapped reads from SGDP dataset. Figure S3: Promoter regions associated with CpG islands predicetd by CpGProD in non-reference gap-closing sequneces.
History
Article title
Closing Human Reference Genome Gaps: Identifying and Characterizing Gap-Closing Sequences