1/1
4 files

Supplementary Material for Lau, et al., 2021

dataset
posted on 05.03.2021, 18:26 by Celia K.S. Lau, Meghan Jelen, Michael D. Gordon

File S1. Full screen dataset in graphical form. For each line tested in the screen, the following data is displayed: genotype and expression pattern taken from FlyLight database (Jenett et al. 2012); endpoint and time course values for the preference index; interaction numbers displayed for individual flies across each channel, as means for each channel, as pooled data across both channels, and as cumulative average over time. For all graphs, yellow indicates the experimental (retinal fed) group and grey indicates the control (no retinal). Bar graphs and time curves represent mean +/- SEM. Red shading denotes light-triggering channel for preference indices, time curves, and interaction numbers. For total interaction numbers, the data from individual flies are connected by lines. A key to interpreting the data is presented on the first page.

File S2. Raw interaction numbers from screen. Each tab holds the data for an individual genotype. Raw interaction counts are shown from the endpoint of each experiment (summary table) and as cumulative counts over time for each replicate.

File S3. Full dataset preference indices from screen. Each tab holds the data for an individual genotype. Preference indices are shown from the endpoint of each experiment (summary table) and as cumulative preference over time for each replicate.

File S4. Raw data for figures 2 and 3.

History

Article title

A closed-loop optogenetic screen for neurons controlling feeding in Drosophila