%0 Generic %A Owens, Brenda F. %A Mathew, Deepu %A Diepenbrock, Christine %A Tiede, Tyler %A wu, di %A Mateos-Hernandez, Maria %A Gore, Michael %A Rocheford, Torbert %D 2019 %T Supplemental Material for Owens et al., 2019 %U https://gsajournals.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Supplemental_Material_for_Owens_et_al_2019/7638590 %R 10.25387/g3.7638590.v1 %2 https://gsajournals.figshare.com/ndownloader/files/14190662 %2 https://gsajournals.figshare.com/ndownloader/files/14190665 %2 https://gsajournals.figshare.com/ndownloader/files/14190668 %2 https://gsajournals.figshare.com/ndownloader/files/14190671 %2 https://gsajournals.figshare.com/ndownloader/files/14703575 %K colorimeter %K carotenoid %K isoprenoid %K genome-wide association study %K biofortification %K Quantitative Genetics (incl. Disease and Trait Mapping Genetics) %K Plant Biology %K Crop and Pasture Improvement (Selection and Breeding) %X Supplemental tables and figure.

Figure S1. Manhattan plots depicting genome-wide association study (GWAS) results for five kernel colorimeter traits in the Ames maize inbred panel. Each point represents a SNP, with its physical position on the x-axis and -log10 P-value in GWAS on the y-axis. The points are colored by chromosome. The horizontal dashed line corresponds to the -log10 P-value of the SNP that was least statistically significant for a given trait at a false discovery rate of 5%.
%I GSA Journals