%0 Figure %A Das, Arunika %A Cesario, Jeffry %A Hinman, Anna Maria %A Jang, Janet K. %A S.McKim, Kim %D 2018 %T Supplemental Material for Das et al., 2018 %U https://gsajournals.figshare.com/articles/figure/Supplemental_Material_for_Das_et_al_2018/5952370 %R 10.25387/g3.5952370.v1 %2 https://gsajournals.figshare.com/ndownloader/files/10660423 %2 https://gsajournals.figshare.com/ndownloader/files/10660429 %2 https://gsajournals.figshare.com/ndownloader/files/10660417 %2 https://gsajournals.figshare.com/ndownloader/files/10660426 %2 https://gsajournals.figshare.com/ndownloader/files/10660420 %2 https://gsajournals.figshare.com/ndownloader/files/10660432 %K Kinesin 6 %K Meiosis %K Drosophila %K chromosome segregation %K microtubule %K oocyte %K Genetics %X Fertility and nondisjunction data for subito transgenes in a wild-type background are in Table S1 (in File S1). The percentages of oocytes in each category of spindle morphology determined cytologically is in Table S2 (in File S1). Examples of these spindle categories are in Figure S2. Western blots showing oocyte expression of each mutant transgene is shown in Figures S1, S3 and S5. Cytology of mutants not shown in Figures 1-7 are shown in Figures S4 and S5.
%I GSA Journals